Low bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
yes, both the lightweight and no-script versions are VAST improvements over the original. it's like night and day. there were times i would avoid the official documentation just because the website was...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
Anand, this (script free) is a vast improvement precisely because it is a return to the web as it was intended, which is to say a giant collaboratively maintained hyperlinked document, not a multimedia...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
The font size and table spacing are oddly larger (liking the font/size used for ScriptFree and Classic more), and the indentation of the description under the function parameter lists is barely 2 em,...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
Thank for the feedback :)Anand.. Group Manager| Developer Division| Microsoft Corp.| http://blogs.msdn.com/sandcastle/ http://blogs.msdn.com/innovation/
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
For the MSDN library, the huge header and frequently faulty TOC that you have to scroll up to see just get in the way IMO.
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
yes, both the lightweight and no-script versions are VAST improvements over the original. it's like night and day. there were times i would avoid the official documentation just because the website was...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
Anand, this (script free) is a vast improvement precisely because it is a return to the web as it was intended, which is to say a giant collaboratively maintained hyperlinked document, not a multimedia...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
The font size and table spacing are oddly larger (liking the font/size used for ScriptFree and Classic more), and the indentation of the description under the function parameter lists is barely 2 em,...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
Thank for the feedback :)Anand.. Group Manager| Developer Division| Microsoft Corp.| http://blogs.msdn.com/sandcastle/ http://blogs.msdn.com/innovation/
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
For the MSDN library, the huge header and frequently faulty TOC that you have to scroll up to see just get in the way IMO.
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
yes, both the lightweight and no-script versions are VAST improvements over the original. it's like night and day. there were times i would avoid the official documentation just because the website was...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
Anand, this (script free) is a vast improvement precisely because it is a return to the web as it was intended, which is to say a giant collaboratively maintained hyperlinked document, not a multimedia...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
The font size and table spacing are oddly larger (liking the font/size used for ScriptFree and Classic more), and the indentation of the description under the function parameter lists is barely 2 em,...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
Thank for the feedback :)Anand.. Group Manager| Developer Division| Microsoft Corp.| http://blogs.msdn.com/sandcastle/ http://blogs.msdn.com/innovation/
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
For the MSDN library, the huge header and frequently faulty TOC that you have to scroll up to see just get in the way IMO.
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
yes, both the lightweight and no-script versions are VAST improvements over the original. it's like night and day. there were times i would avoid the official documentation just because the website was...
View ArticleLow bandwith view is way more usable than the normal view
Anand, this (script free) is a vast improvement precisely because it is a return to the web as it was intended, which is to say a giant collaboratively maintained hyperlinked document, not a multimedia...
View Article
